The American Red Cross

Grief Without God: Surviving Tragedy as a Non-Believer in a Sea of Religion

  • When: Saturday, April 19, 2014 @ 4:00 pm
  • Audubon Zoo, 6500 Magazine St, New Orleans, LA view map

....Could Someone Throw Me a Life Raft?


Our speaker in April will be Kristi Hart, RN, CCE, Anthropologist, Museum Specialist, and Advocate. This is a very important topic, since many of us may have already dealt with inadequate and insensitive reactions from the medical community, relatives and others who assume that religion will comfort us when it obviously won't. It's a chance to improve awareness for you and your family!


Here’s an overview of what she will cover:    

* The experience of dealing with grief as an atheist or agnostic.
* Dealing with well meaning (and sometimes not so well meaning) religious people during intense grief.   
* Brief overview of non-religious funeral options    
* The serious lack of secular grief support services in hospitals (and communities and examples of what is available.) She will also address how many of the "support services" are solely based around Christianity, which not only alienates atheists and agnostics, but people of different religious beliefs as well.   
* Her own personal "struggles" as an RN with trying to introduce secular grief and bereavement support into hospitals and the strong resistance she has faced from hospital administration.   
* Testimony of other grieving atheists and agnostics and their struggles to find secular support.   
* Suggestions for establishing local secular grief and bereavement support services.


See Calendar for more information.

 

Senate Hearing to Repeal the Louisiana's Creationism Law

  • When: Thursday, April 24, 2014 @ 9:00 am
  • Louisiana State Capitol, 900 N 3rd St, Baton Rouge, LA view map

SB 175 to repeal Louisiana’s creationism law will be heard in Senate Education Committee meeting in the Hainkel room of the Louisiana State Capitol on Thursday April 24th. We need your support!

Please join our campaign to repeal the misnamed and misguided Louisiana Science Education Act, R.S. 17:285.1, which was passed by the Louisiana Legislature in 2008.

_______________________________________________________________

Please come support science. Even if you can't make it or are from out of state, you can follow these steps to help:


See Calendar for more information.

 

HBO Doesn't Make The Case for Questioning Darwin

04/03/2014
HBO’s recently aired documentary Questioning Darwin is 60 minutes of documentary trash. It ignores science completely, minimizes diversity within Christianity, distorts Charles Darwin’s personal struggle with faith and science, engages in agonizingly endless emotional appeals for religious faith, and perpetuates ridiculous myths about evolution and religion. The few moments of useful information scattered throughout the film fail to make up for its overwhelming volume of irrelevancy. If Questioning Darwin captures any significant aspect of the evolution-creation debate at all, it is only the perspective of the most ardently literal bible-believer, but even that perspective is described in only the most superficial terms.

One might expect that a documentary titled Questioning Darwin would at some point discuss scientific evidence for evolution. It doesn't. There is a brief note that science understands the earth to be ancient, but not a single hint as to why. There’s a passing mention of evidence of change in animal forms, but no detailed discussion. There is no mention at all of many other lines of evidence, some of them critical to an understanding of the theory. There’s not a single word about the observable sorting of fossils into layers of age-related life-forms, no reference to the complete absence of out-of-sequence fossils, nor a whisper about test-tube-verifiable genetics. In terms of comprehending the science of evolution, Questioning Darwin is a complete failure.

The film’s presentation of Christian perspectives is only slightly more competent. Many Christian individuals and not a few denominations see no conflict between science and religion generally, nor between evolution and Genesis in particular. Many Christian believers are quite willing to take parts of the Bible as allegory, metaphor, or just plain folktales. Many understand that their scripture is not a primer on science or history, and don’t try to insit otherwise. But these Christians are nearly invisible in the film, which almost exclusively presents the views of biblical literalists. The viewer is left with the impression that Christianity per se insists the earth is 6,000 years old, there was a real global flood, and there were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark.

Charles Darwin himself is portrayed as engaged in a lifelong struggle with religious faith. To be clear, Darwindid grow up in the Anglican Church, accepted basic Christian doctrine in his younger years, and even contemplated becoming a clergyman at one point. But the film understates Darwin’s lifelong commitment to systematic observation of biological facts, and the application of logic to evidence. Darwindid struggle with the implications of his theory, but was more concerned about what other people would make of it, and very little about the implications for his own spiritual life. His own certainty in the reality of evolution was solid, his religious faith left in tatters by years of scientific practice. The film fails to capture what Darwinknew even at an early age: that observation and logic lead to truth, and that any hypothesis, no matter how appealing, must be abandoned when comprehensive evidence goes against it.

Much of film was entirely irrelevant to any question about Darwinor Evolution. Long sections portrayed persons in difficult, even tragic, situations, who found solace in religion, could not imagine getting through life without divine assistance, believed in miracles, or simply could not believe they (or humanity) had arisen from simpler forms of life. It seems never to occur to the filmmaker that this crude appeal to emotion has nothing to do with evidence, or even with evolution. The undeniable facts that some people long for a god, hope for a miracle, imagine God helped them through a crisis, or believe that human beings have a divine dignity, do not constitute evidence of any external truth. Even if we accept, as some people in the film do, that evolution teaches people they are animals, and so leads them to behave like animals, that is not evidence against the theory. It’s not evidence of anything, as logic does not allow us to ignore selected facts merely because they disappoint us or make us uncomfortable. About half of the film was this kind of teary-eyed question-begging, none of which did anything to illuminate questions relating to evolution, or to the relationship between science and religion.

What the film does manage to leave the viewers with is a massive myth regularly employed by creationists: the notion that science and Christianity exist in some kind of binary opposition. Had the film bothered to present actual evidence either for or against evolution or Christian doctrine, the viewer might be able to evaluate that binary, but no such evidence was provided. More realistically, this particular binary opposition is an idiotic idea. The Theory of Evolution says absolutely nothing about souls, heaven, God, Jesus, or the Bible. If there is a conflict with religion, it is only that some believers choose to interpret their particular scripture as a science textbook. The key word there is “interpret.” For although the most ardent anti-evolutionists always claim they are taking the Bible "literally," nothing could be further from the truth. There is no chapter or verse that plainly states the earth is 6,000 years old. Nowhere does it say that the six days of creation were each 24 hours long. Where is the page that says that Tyrannosaurs Rex, with sword-like teeth, were originally vegetarians? In what chapter does it actually say that the fossils we find today were laid down by Noah’s flood? Where are the verses that tell us that radiometric dating is unreliable because rates of radioactive decay have changed over time, or that the light of distant stars was created in transit? None of this can be found there. None of it is literal. All of it is an interpretation, and a very extended and convoluted interpretation at that.

Although the God-or-Darwin binary opposition is ridiculous on its face, it is an effective evangelistic tool. It really is the only tool that makes sense of the film. We may sympathize, perhaps even empathize, with the human suffering of the mother whose child is in a coma, or with the reformed prostitute or the drug addict in recovery. Obviously, that has nothing to say or to do with Darwin or Evolution. Or at least it ought not, unless we accept the God-or-Darwin opposition. If we do accept that binary, then maybe we could be moved to faith by the film’s emotional appeal, and having been moved to faith we would have to leave behind the only alternative, which is godless Darwinism. It’s black and white, either-or, one or the other. Questioning Darwin, then, was nothing more than a vehicle for the views of the least competent questioners of Darwin, those who know nothing of science, know nothing of scripture, and claim to be reading the Bible literally when they’re just making up stories.
~ By Jim Dugan


Jesus & Mo

smart2

Mo teeters on the brink of self-knowledge. Careful, Mo!

There’s 20% off all Lulu purchases if you use the code WAFFLESSAY20 at checkout (until March 31). Just in case you’re thinking of buying a book.

Flattr this for Jesus Book shop here

smart2
26 March 2014 | 11:00 am

 
nosha on blogspot
The New Orleans Secular Humanist Assoc. Blog - Contemporary resources for atheists and freethinkers in Louisiana
 

FSM

Membership & Donations

Becoming a member, or renewing a membership, is easy. Click on the membership button. If you would like to donate, go to the About Us page.

Membership is $20.00 per household. It's fast, easy, and mostly painless.

 

What is Humanism?

Humanists reject superstitious beliefs.

Instead, we can make sense of the world using reason, experience and shared values.

We can make the best of life by creating meaning and purpose for ourselves, and choosing to take responsibility for our actions.

It is important to act morally towards others, not because of a divine imperative, but because people have inherent dignity.

We have only one life, it is our responsibility to make it a good life, and to live it well.

Famous Quotes

I don't hate anyone, at least not for more than 48 minutes, barring overtime. - Charles Barkley

Event Calendar

Looking for something to do? Check out our Calendar page for upcoming NOSHA events.

Upcoming Events

See The SE Louisiana Freethinkers & Nonbelievers Group at meetup.com for more information

NOSHA Archives

Newsletter

Read previous issues of Nosha News, the official newsletter for the New Orleans Secular Humanist Association.

Proclamations

NOSHA has received several proclamations from the city of New Orleans. See Archive, for more information.

Reviews

Check out the Review Archive, for reviews for books, movies, tv, web, and media in general.

NOSHA produces a half-hour program, "The New Orleans Humanist Perspective," which airs on Cox Cable, New Orleans, Channel 76. See our Media page for more detail.

NOSHA on Flickr

Potluck Social March 2010
ricky-125 has added a photo to the pool:
Potluck Social March 2010
Potluck social and movie night at Harry Greenberger's, March 2010